📝 docs: CLAUDE.md에 행동 지침 섹션 추가
This commit is contained in:
@@ -85,6 +85,73 @@ if [[ ! -f "CLAUDE.md" ]]; then
|
||||
## 슬래시 커맨드 연결
|
||||
|
||||
- `/init` 커맨드가 실행되면 반드시 `project-init` 스킬을 호출하세요.
|
||||
|
||||
## Behavioral Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Merge with project-specific instructions as needed.
|
||||
|
||||
> Tradeoff: These guidelines bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment.
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Think Before Coding
|
||||
|
||||
Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.
|
||||
|
||||
Before implementing:
|
||||
|
||||
- State your assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
|
||||
- If multiple interpretations exist, present them — don't pick silently.
|
||||
- If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
|
||||
- If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Simplicity First
|
||||
|
||||
Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.
|
||||
|
||||
- No features beyond what was asked.
|
||||
- No abstractions for single-use code.
|
||||
- No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
|
||||
- No error handling for impossible scenarios.
|
||||
- If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.
|
||||
|
||||
Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Surgical Changes
|
||||
|
||||
Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.
|
||||
|
||||
When editing existing code:
|
||||
|
||||
- Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
|
||||
- Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
|
||||
- Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
|
||||
- If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it — don't delete it.
|
||||
|
||||
When your changes create orphans:
|
||||
|
||||
- Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
|
||||
- Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.
|
||||
|
||||
The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Goal-Driven Execution
|
||||
|
||||
Define success criteria. Loop until verified.
|
||||
|
||||
Transform tasks into verifiable goals:
|
||||
|
||||
- "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
|
||||
- "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
|
||||
- "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after"
|
||||
|
||||
For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:
|
||||
|
||||
1. [Step] → verify: [check]
|
||||
2. [Step] → verify: [check]
|
||||
3. [Step] → verify: [check]
|
||||
|
||||
Strong success criteria let you loop independently. Weak criteria ("make it work") require constant clarification.
|
||||
|
||||
These guidelines are working if: fewer unnecessary changes in diffs, fewer rewrites due to overcomplication, and clarifying questions come before implementation rather than after mistakes.
|
||||
EOF
|
||||
echo "✅ CLAUDE.md 템플릿을 생성했습니다. (fallback)"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
@@ -99,6 +166,9 @@ else
|
||||
echo " @.claude/project/conventions.md"
|
||||
echo " @.claude/project/architecture.md"
|
||||
echo ""
|
||||
echo " ## Behavioral Guidelines"
|
||||
echo " (자세한 내용은 $TARGET_PATH/templates/CLAUDE.md.tpl 참고)"
|
||||
echo ""
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
# 4) 공통 skill 심볼릭 링크 (.claude/common/skills/* → .claude/skills/*)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -11,3 +11,70 @@
|
||||
## 슬래시 커맨드 연결
|
||||
|
||||
- `/init` 커맨드가 실행되면 반드시 `project-init` 스킬을 호출하세요.
|
||||
|
||||
## Behavioral Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Merge with project-specific instructions as needed.
|
||||
|
||||
> Tradeoff: These guidelines bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment.
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Think Before Coding
|
||||
|
||||
Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.
|
||||
|
||||
Before implementing:
|
||||
|
||||
- State your assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
|
||||
- If multiple interpretations exist, present them — don't pick silently.
|
||||
- If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
|
||||
- If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Simplicity First
|
||||
|
||||
Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.
|
||||
|
||||
- No features beyond what was asked.
|
||||
- No abstractions for single-use code.
|
||||
- No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
|
||||
- No error handling for impossible scenarios.
|
||||
- If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.
|
||||
|
||||
Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Surgical Changes
|
||||
|
||||
Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.
|
||||
|
||||
When editing existing code:
|
||||
|
||||
- Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
|
||||
- Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
|
||||
- Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
|
||||
- If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it — don't delete it.
|
||||
|
||||
When your changes create orphans:
|
||||
|
||||
- Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
|
||||
- Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.
|
||||
|
||||
The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Goal-Driven Execution
|
||||
|
||||
Define success criteria. Loop until verified.
|
||||
|
||||
Transform tasks into verifiable goals:
|
||||
|
||||
- "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
|
||||
- "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
|
||||
- "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after"
|
||||
|
||||
For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:
|
||||
|
||||
1. [Step] → verify: [check]
|
||||
2. [Step] → verify: [check]
|
||||
3. [Step] → verify: [check]
|
||||
|
||||
Strong success criteria let you loop independently. Weak criteria ("make it work") require constant clarification.
|
||||
|
||||
These guidelines are working if: fewer unnecessary changes in diffs, fewer rewrites due to overcomplication, and clarifying questions come before implementation rather than after mistakes.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user